Philipp Rastemborski
LL.M. (Edinburgh)
Attorney-at-law
Certified Intellectual Property Attorney
Representative before the UPC
Philipp Rastemborski
LL.M. (Edinburgh)
Attorney-at-law
Certified Intellectual Property Attorney
Representative before the UPC
Philipp Rastemborski specialises in national and cross-border patent infringement proceedings and parallel validity proceedings.
His expertise lies in representing clients in complex infringement and nullity proceedings, in the enforcement of standard-essential patents and all related antitrust issues. In addition, he advises on utility model and design law, on the protection of intellectual property under competition law, on the protection of trade secrets and on employee invention law.
Philipp Rastemborski also has experience in IP-related arbitration proceedings and the drafting of licensing programmes, in particular in the context of research and development cooperations.
Philipp Rastemborski regularly publishes on current topics of patent law and antitrust law.
IAM Patent 1000 (2024) and LeadersLeague (2024) recommend Philipp Rastemborski for patent litigation. Managing IP ranks him as „Patent Star 2024“.
He speaks German and English.
Contact
Philipp Rastemborski
LL.M. (Edinburgh)
Attorney-at-law
Certified Intellectual Property Attorney
Representative before the UPC
Partner
Tel +49 89 5490750
prastemborski@eisenfuhr.com
Eisenführ Speiser
Gollierstraße 4
80339 Munich
Industries
Fields of Practice
- Telecommunications
- Chip technology
- Software
CV
Studied law at the Free University of Berlin, Master's degree at the University of Edinburgh (LL.M. in European Law): Master's thesis on the "essential facility doctrine" iSv. Art. 102 TFEU, Traineeship at the Berlin Court of Appeal and the German Embassy in Bangkok
Memberships
- German Association for the Protection of Intellectual Property (GRUR)
- Licensing Executives Society (LES)
- Association of Intellectual Property Experts (VPP)
- German Arbitration Institute (DIS)
Publications & Presentations
Court of Appeal confirms principles for claim interpretation. Beitrag zur UPC-Entscheidung UPC_CoA_1/2024.
GRUR Patent, Ausgabe 08/2024
Recent Case Law in German Patent Law 2023
published by Eisenführ Speiser
Anm. zu Unitary Patent Court: LD Munich opens door for file wrapper estoppel at the UPC
GRUR Patent, Ausgabe 02/2024
Anm. zu BGH: Verjährung des Anspruchs auf Patentübertragung
GRUR-Prax 2024, 340
Anm. zu EPG Lokalkammer München: Einstweilige Unterlassungsverfügung aus Einheitspatent
in GRUR-Prax 2023, 640
Panel on the role of the UPC in global patent litigation campaigns
28th Annual Advanced Patent Law Institute, Austin, November 2023
Panel on the Unified Patent Court
The Sedona Conference, Annual Meeting WG 9 + 10, Mai 2023
The Intellectual Property Review: Germany
in "The Law Reviews" (mit Niels Schuh), Mai 2023
It is Sunrise – Get Prepared for the Forthcoming Unified Patent Court
BPIP 2023 Conference, Tel Aviv, März 2023
Unified Patent Court & Unitary Patent System
Auto IP & Legal World Summit, München, März 2023
Preliminary Injunctions Injunctions and Protective Letters before the UPC
Lexology
Anm. zu BGH: Zum Verhältnis von Einspruchsverfahren und Patentnichtigkeitsklage
Anm. zu BGH in GRUR-Prax, 2023, 204
UK High Court setzt erneut eine weltweite FRAND-Lizenz fest
Anm. zu High Court of England & Wales in GRUR-Prax, 2023
Eine neue Ära für Europas Wirtschaft: Einheitliches Patentgericht nimmt seine Arbeit auf
Artikel in der Braunschweiger Zeitung
Keine Lizenzunwilligkeit bei Anti-Suit-Injunction in Rechtsstreit gegen Dritten
Anm. zu LG München I in GRUR-Prax, 2023, 43
UPC 2022
IAM Connect Webinar, Dezember 2022
Zu den Anforderungen einer Urkundenvorlage durch die nicht beweisbelastete Partei
Anm. zu BGH in GRUR-Prax, 2023, 204
Teleologische Reduktion des § 14 II 3 Nr. 1 UWG bei individueller E-Mail
Anm. zu OLG Düsseldorf in GRUR-Prax, 2022, 328
Notwendigkeit einer Ausgleichsklausel bei Doppellizensierung durch Poollizenzen
Anm. zu LG Düsseldorf in GRUR-Prax, 2022, 316
The Unified Patent Court is coming – benefits and risks of the new court system
OxViews Webinar, Juni 2022
Injunctions and the Principle of Equity – A German Perspective
OxViews 7th Intellectual Property and Competition Forum, Juni 2022
Gerichtsstand bei UWG-Verstoß in Telemedien
Anm. zu LG München I in GRUR-Prax 2022, 62
German Patent Law & Ligitation
IP Watchdog International IP, März 2022
Steuerkanalsignalisierung II
Anm. zum Urteil des OLG Karlsruhe in Mitteilungen der deutschen Patentanwälte, 2020
Verletzung eines Geschäftsgeheimnisses durch den berechtigten Besitzer
Anm. zu OGH Wien in GRUR-Prax, 2021, 579
IP rights in competition in Germany
in Lexology "Intellectual Property and Antitrust", 2022
German Patent Law & Litigation
Bayerischer Patentanwaltsverein e.V., November 2021
EuGH-Vorlage zu einstweiligem Rechtsschutz in Patentsachen
Anm. zu LG München I in GRUR-Prax 2021, 109
The Revised German Patent Act – What Practitioners need to know
OxFirst 6th IP and Competition Forum – The Future of FRAND, Juni 2021
Verlust der FRAND-Lizenzwilligkeit bei Antrag auf Anti-Suit-Injunction
Anm. zu LG München I in GRUR-Prax, 2021, 350
What SEPs and FRAND mean for players in the distribution chain
Online-Seminar, Mai 2021
Anm. zu OLG Karlsruhe: FRAND-Einwand: Zur Lizenzwilligkeit bei Gegen-angebot nach § 315 BGB
Anm. zu OLG Karlsruhe in GRUR-Prax, 2021, 315
Zurechnung im Ausland durchgeführter Verfahrensschritte bei Patentverletzung
Anm. zu LG Düsseldorf in GRUR-Prax 2020, 413
SEP Litigation and FRAND Defence in Germany
in Lexology "Intellectual Property and Antitrust", 2021
Litigating standard-essential patents in Germany
in Lexology "Intellectual Property and Antitrust", 2020
DE – NOKIA V. DAIMLER
in EPLAW Blog, Oktober 2020
FRAND-Einwand I
Anm. zu BGH, KZR 36/17 in Mitteilungen der deutschen Patentanwälte, 2020
DE - Preliminary Injunctions involving Patents and German Utility Models
in EPLAW Blog, März 2020
Trommeleinheit
Anm. zu BGH, X ZR 55/16 in Mitteilungen der deutschen Patentanwälte, 2018, 61
Geschäftsführerhaftung
Anm. zu BGH, I ZR 242/11 in Mitteilungen der deutschen Patentanwälte, 2014, 518